Skip to main content
Solved

Apple ID needing again

  • September 21, 2016
  • 7 replies
  • 29 views

LaSagesse
Forum|alt.badge.img+6

Hi all,

My students have just download the last iOS, now when they download apps from self service, they need an Apple ID... Do you have the same problem ?

With the "older" iOS i don't have this problem.... (I use JSS 9.92 - select VPP devices assignement - self servie is install automatically - but not now because it need Apple ID...)

Thanks !

Best answer by cpdecker

JSS 9.92 doesn't support device-based licensing for iOS 10. We are upgrading to JSS 9.96 to hopefully fix this issue. Will let you know how it goes!

7 replies

Forum|alt.badge.img+8
  • Valued Contributor
  • Answer
  • September 21, 2016

JSS 9.92 doesn't support device-based licensing for iOS 10. We are upgrading to JSS 9.96 to hopefully fix this issue. Will let you know how it goes!


LaSagesse
Forum|alt.badge.img+6
  • Author
  • Contributor
  • September 21, 2016

Thanks for your answer, i will upgrade JSS soon !


Forum|alt.badge.img+8
  • Contributor
  • September 21, 2016

So far so good here. JSS 9.96 with a mixture of 9.3.X and 10.0.1 devices. Device based assignments are working as expected!


LaSagesse
Forum|alt.badge.img+6
  • Author
  • Contributor
  • September 22, 2016

Thanks cpdecker ! it's work


Forum|alt.badge.img+5
  • Contributor
  • September 22, 2016

I had a freshly setup iPad on 10.0.1 and JSS 9.96 yesterday keep prompting for Apple ID / password. It appeared that one of the apps didn't get licenses properly or something.

Never had that issue on iOS 9.3.x


Forum|alt.badge.img+8
  • Valued Contributor
  • September 23, 2016

9.96 is allowing us to use device-based licensing on 10.0.1 as well.

@smurphyusd346 , if this was a brand new iPad, or if the iPad was very recently on an iOS version that didn't support device-based licensing, I think it will still take the JSS a few minutes to allocate a license for that device. That has been my experience at least.


Forum|alt.badge.img+5
  • Contributor
  • September 23, 2016

@cpdecker It was a device that I've already used on Device-based licensing.