Skip to main content
Question

drive mappings...

  • October 27, 2010
  • 3 replies
  • 16 views

Forum|alt.badge.img+6

Hi everyone, Is anyone else automatically mapping afp or smb shares through Casper's
MCX? I'm having a hard time sustaining my multiple afp drive mappings on
machines. It was working and now it seems to have just stopped. This is
what I basically map using different servers/shares and it's enforced via
user level. Does anyone have any ideas?

<dict> <key>AuthenticateAsLoginUserShortName</key> <true/> <key>Hide</key> <false/> <key>URL</key> <string>afp://my.domain.server/share</string>
</dict>

John McLaughlin
Technical Support Specialist
Newton Public Schools

3 replies

Forum|alt.badge.img+21
  • Contributor
  • October 27, 2010

Not using MCX, using NetworkShares script from the Resource Kit.

Craig E


Forum|alt.badge.img+31
  • Honored Contributor
  • October 27, 2010

I use OD instead of Casper for MCX, but if I were to lose or ditch OD and go with Casper this is how I would add the network shares (and probably most MCX files that is).

1) Load Work Group Manager on a box

2) Mount all the shares manually from the box with WGM on it

3) Pick my level of management, user/group/computer and go into log in items. Then select the network share and add it as a log in item.

4) export mcx file via command line and use Casper to import it to client machines

I suppose you may be able to use Composer in this case as well. This will show you what plist files are modified/created to add the network shares to the login items. If Kerberos is all good, then when a user logs in their credentials should be passed and the mounts automatically mounted at log in.

This is because Casper just uses the local node for MCX and puts the framework behind it. Otherwise, these features are already built into OS X. Which is why Casper is a good thing. It doesn't use any third party magic and just takes what Apple builds and makes it easier/better for us to use.

-Tom

?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>


talkingmoose
Forum|alt.badge.img+36
  • Community Manager
  • October 27, 2010

I'm doing both AFP and SMB but only with Kerberized systems. What you show
On 10/27/10 9:32 AM, "John McLaughlin" <John_McLaughlin at newton.k12.ma.us> wrote:
above is the same structure I'm using, including enforcing at User level.
The only difference I see is that I've included the <dict> within an
<array>.

--

William Smith
Technical Analyst
Merrill Communications LLC
(651) 632-1492