Skip to main content
Question

WOW

  • March 7, 2015
  • 30 replies
  • 102 views

Show first post

30 replies

emily
Forum|alt.badge.img+26
  • Hall of Fame
  • March 9, 2015

Hooray @michael.abbott for sharing the good news.

Although… user picture is still a bit squished. Or maybe I'm just overly picky about Wonder Woman's presentation…


Forum|alt.badge.img+12
  • Valued Contributor
  • March 9, 2015

Updates look better, thanks @michael.abbott


Chris_Hafner
Forum|alt.badge.img+27
  • Jamf Heroes
  • March 10, 2015

WARNING... HIJACK! @damienbarrett Apple has completely given up on manual control of AppleTVs. So far as AppleTVs are concerned, the move to 10.10 and iOS 8.x tries to get the damned things off the network whenever possible as opposed to making them easier to control. It's their continuation towards their version of PAN (bluetooth discovery and LOTs of AdHoc wifi network connections.

Back to the topic at hand. OK, it's a little quirky but overall I like the new motif. Besides, change is inevitable. What doesn't change now-a-days dies... except for Cheeseburgers. Cheeseburgers are forever.


Forum|alt.badge.img+4
  • Contributor
  • March 10, 2015

@michael.abbott Thanks, the digest is looking normal now and JN threads are a bit more readable.
Cheeseburgers are functioning normally.


mm2270
Forum|alt.badge.img+24
  • Legendary Contributor
  • March 25, 2015

So, I may make a feature request out of this, but I'm finding one annoying aspect of the new site code is when highlighting a URL and clicking the "link" icon in the text editor. I would prefer it myself if instead of creating a text link with the words [my link text] that it actually copied the highlighted URL and used that instead, so for example, if I copy/paste in something like http://www.apple.com, highlight it and click the link button, I'd prefer if it set things up like [http://www.apple.com](http://www.apple.com)
Every time I use this function I need to replace the [my link text] words with something that makes more sense in the context of the discussion.

Its admittedly a minor thing, but, any chance this could be changed in the future?