I serve as the special education tech support for a large school district. It's my job to organize the management of about 500 iPads being deployed to Special Education staff and students.
I feel like even through we've been doing it for over a year and a half in Casper that we are still in our infancy stages of deploying iPads. We worked closely with an Apple Engineer and JAMF to get up and running in Casper and created a plan that at the time seemed pretty solid. Now, it's starting to seem like that plan may not be as solid as we thought and I was hoping to get a perspective from someone else deploying iPads to see how we can tweak things to make it more efficient.
Specifically, I have quite a few questions about iPads given out to special education students and staff as they tend to be a bit more "flexible" with their needs then regular education is. It will be helpful for me if when you reply, you let me know whether or not you deal with special education iPads and a relative size of your district.
I'll start right away with the questions for those of you short on time. A bit of background will be below that explaining what our current practices are like.
Our specific questions are…
1) Do you manage free apps in Casper? Our fear is if we start this practice that our app list will become unmanageable.
2) How much freedom/flexibility do you allow for iPads deployed to Special Ed Staff or Students? Is it "you get what you get and you don't have a fit"? Is it anything goes? Or somewhere in between?
3) Do you allow your students or staff to keep their iPads over the summer.
4) We currently do our app assignments under the Users tab first and then we do the app assignment under the Mobile Devices tab so that they show up in Self Service. Is that the way you do that?
5) What about cases? We need to be flexible with students who have unique motor needs, but what about in general? Do you just have one or two styles of cases for folks to choose from (like one keyboard case and one non-keyboard case)? Do you let folks choose whatever case they want as a group? or individually?
To give you a bit of background…
We currently have been deploying iPads primarily in 3 ways.
A group of staff ask for iPads to be assigned to them personally to be used for productivity and to be used one to one with students. (for example, every speech pathologist in our district now has an iPad) We have those staff sign into their iPads with their active directory accounts and then they sign into an iTunes account that THEY manage. When a group requests a set of iPads in this scenario, we ask them to come up with a list of apps that the group wants. We leave the iPads unlocked so they can add their own apps. If an individual wants an app, they get it approved by a supervisor and then we add the app to that individual.
OR
A teacher or a Teaching and Learning Specialists (TALS) creates what we call an innovative grant where they request a group of iPads for a specific purpose. (for example, we have a Social Communication class in each of our high schools. that each got a set of 5 iPads) In this case, we have created fake active directory accounts as well as fake iTunes accounts for each of those iPads based off their Asset Tag number. When the teacher or TALS makes the request for the iPads, we have them identify the apps that they want deployed to the entire group. If an individual wants an additional app, they make that request to a supervisor and we add that app to that individual's group of iPads. We leave the iPads unlocked so they can add their own apps, HOWEVER, we ask that if they add their own free apps, that they sign out of the fake account and sign into any account that they manage and make that "purchase". Our rationale behind this is that these iTunes accounts could end up being used by someone else if the iPad gets deployed to someone else. That "someone else" may sign into that account and assume that everything in the purchase history is good stuff and download it even though it may have been an app that the person was just reviewing and then decided it was garbage. Our rational behind leaving the iPads unlocked is it follows our district's current policy of encouraging innovation by allowing staff to have more control over their devices.
OR
A teacher has one student that they are interested in seeing if an iPad is the correct tool to meet a specific need. (for example, a student who is Blind/VI who needs books read aloud) This works somewhat in the same way as the innovative grant iPads with the caveat that these are trial iPads meaning that they get the iPad to use with the student. We have created fake active directory accounts as well as fake iTunes accounts for each of those iPads based off their Asset Tag number. When the teacher or TALS makes the request for the iPad, we have them identify the apps that they want deployed to that iPad. If they want an additional app, they make that request to a supervisor and we add that app to that individual's iPad. We leave the iPads unlocked so they can add their own apps, HOWEVER, we ask that if they add their own free apps, that they sign out of the fake account and sign into any account that they manage and make that "purchase". Same reasons as above.
We've been questioning some of our practices. If any of what you've read above raises red flags for you. Or you know of a better way to do it, please let us know.