Hello Team
From my understanding and different tests, Compliance panel is accessible only if OIDC has been enabled on the Jamf Pro Single sign-on configuration.
Arg ! Domain verification 🥶 (how to.. request 4 validations process in a day)
Skip it, and just use Jamf account without IDP.. not secure but it's beta instance.
Is it something you are going to remove after the Beta ?
Indeed, i do not understand the use case : security ?
I do not think to be the only one, my Jamf Pro console access is secure by an IDP.
- I cannot explain to my Identity Teams: that we need to connect the IDP to Jamf Account website, to list users that need also to be listed on Jamf Pro, which need to be allowed in the IDP app access...🥴 to allow admins to connect on the Jamf Pro console. the answer will be : we already have a process in place which is secure and works as expected, why do we have to add another party.
- i cannot explain to my Security Teams: that we are going to use a new process, not more secure, and which is not covered by the legal agreements we have for Jamf Pro.
- i cannot explain to myself: that i will need to manage 150 Jamf ID for my colleagues.
Could you please clarify ?
Guys, tell me if you do not think the same and that it's better to authenticate our consoles through Jamf Account ?
