Skip to main content
Solved

I must be missing something... (confused....)

  • August 10, 2016
  • 5 replies
  • 30 views
R
Forum|alt.badge.img+8

Hi all,

I have been looking at this for hours now and I cannot seem to find what is going wrong here.

My goal is to have a smart group containing computers which do not have FileMaker Pro of the version 11.0.4.

I have taken some snapshots. 1 is of the criteria, 1 is a listing of found computers who qualify the criteria. and 1 of the application list from the found computer (which should not have been found as this computer DOES have the 11.0.4 version.

I am at a lost......

Best answer by rblaas

ok this is how I ended :)

(I usually find the solution right after I post it online :P)

I needed to create a smart group which is excluding all other versions..

See Attachment

    5 replies

    R
    Forum|alt.badge.img+8
    • rblaas
    • Author
    • Contributor
    • August 10, 2016

    Hmm just thought of this.. Maybe it has something to do with the other version... That would qualify.... :S

    R
    Forum|alt.badge.img+8
    • rblaas
    • Author
    • Contributor
    • Answer
    • August 10, 2016

    ok this is how I ended :)

    (I usually find the solution right after I post it online :P)

    I needed to create a smart group which is excluding all other versions..

    See Attachment

    D
    Forum|alt.badge.img+7
    • dmohs
    • Contributor
    • August 10, 2016

    On a regular basis, I create smart groups for such purposes. Mine work great, though I use the operator "has" instead of "is" for the application title.

    R
    Forum|alt.badge.img+8
    • rblaas
    • Author
    • Contributor
    • August 10, 2016

    @dmohs Difference is that I am looking for machine which do not match. In cases an update is in place..

    But thanks for the input..

    R
    Forum|alt.badge.img+5
    • ronb
    • Contributor
    • August 10, 2016

    @rblaas

    I have something similar for a Microsoft update. Same as your original post image, but instead of "is not 11.0.4", we used "not like 11.0.4". I found in the past that trying to be to precise on the versioning can bite you.

    Terms & ConditionsCookie settingsAccessibility statement