Posted on 03-07-2019 10:39 AM
I have a smart group whose enrollment is based on an application being installed on the computer. I have a configuration profile that is scoped out to this smart group.
Currently I have computers in the smart group, but how do I get the configuration profile to apply? Doesn't appear to be on check in, does it check daily or some other way or am I missing something?
Thanks,
Posted on 03-07-2019 10:59 AM
As soon as Macs fall into a Smart Group that is added to the scope of a Config Profile, the profile should push to the Macs, unless it has already been installed of course.
If you're not seeing newly added machines in Smart Groups get the profiles assigned to those Smart Groups, then something might be configured incorrectly.
As a test, if you manually add a machine into scope for the same Config Profile, does it come down to the device right away, or at least in a short amount of time?
One last question - is the profile you're talking about a User Level profile? Because if so, that is a different story.
Posted on 03-07-2019 11:07 AM
@mm2270 Yes, when I add the computer specifically to the group it works instantaneously.
When I look at the configuration profile when it isn't pushing it out automatically, the pending says N/A, but the smart group does have 2 computers currently in it.
Configuration Profile:
Smart Group:
Posted on 03-07-2019 11:27 AM
Hmm. Curious. I wonder if there is some bug here you're seeing. Unless I'm just missing something, when a system enters a Smart Group, anything using that Smart Group as the scope for a push/deployment, etc. should become active for that system/systems. If it's a policy, the policy becomes active (assuming all other things are correct) and will run the next time the specific trigger runs. In the case of Configuration Profiles, it should push down right away since it's over the Apple Push service.
I'll do some testing to see if I have any similar problems. Just wondering, but what version of Jamf Pro are you on? I can only test with our cloud instance, which is on the latest, 10.10.1.
Posted on 03-07-2019 01:19 PM
@mm2270 we are on 10.9 still, updating soon, I would be interested in what you find, thank you,
Posted on 03-07-2019 01:51 PM
Is the Configuration Profile level set to Computer level or User level?
Posted on 03-07-2019 02:00 PM
What @ryan.ball asked. I asked the same question earlier but I didn’t see an answer on that.
I’m happy to run some tests, but before I do that, can you let us know what level the profile is set to? Because user level profiles act differently than system ones.
Posted on 03-07-2019 02:48 PM
@ryan.ball , it is set at the user level.
Posted on 03-07-2019 05:38 PM
@jcalvert That's why it shows n/a. User level profiles install at login If the user falls in the scope of the profile. So it could be installed on a single machine multitudes of times depending on if the users fall into scope.
Do you want it to apply to all users on the system? If so, then choose computer level. If you only want to install it for specific users you'd need to additionally limit the scope to a ldap group or local/ldap user list. It will still show n/a there but you can check the completed management commands for the device or the profile section to make sure the profile installed.
Posted on 03-08-2019 08:17 AM
@ryan.ball you got it. I changed it to computer and it fired instantly. The reason I wanted to do the user, was I didn't want the configuration profile to affect the management account, which it appears to do.
Basically, we want to restrict our users from creating accounts and are disabling the users and groups in System preferences. However, if we (management account owners) need to do something it appears to be disabled for us too.
In my testing, what I probably did was set it to computer, noticed the issue, changed it to user level and noticed I could get in on the management account side again, then came time to test on other computers and it was broken - hence the discussion today.
Any suggestions on how to best handle this, want it disabled for the user, but not the management account?
Posted on 03-08-2019 08:29 AM
@jcalvert Two options: